Emma Watson Underwear Photos Hot Topic for Late Night
The Naked Truth: At Least Emma Watson was Wearing Underwear
At the premiere of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," Emma Watson had a slight wardrobe malfunction and inadvertently showed her underwear to the camera eye, which, by extension, meant photos for "the rest of the world." Some say Emma Watson snagged the dress with her
hand as she signed autographs, some say the wind took the fabric and lifted it. Regardless, the wardrobe malfunction left Emma Watson standing on the red carpet with long leg and underwear showing. And like the proper lady, Emma Watson showed a bit of embarrassment at her underwear disclosure (and the subsequent popularity of her photos).
"At least I'm wearing underwear," Emma Watson told David Letterman on "The Late Show" when she stopped by to promote "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." She then hung her head in her hands and said that she was "still learning" this stuff. "This stuff" being the business of celebrity, of having every little move one makes scrutinized by an unforgiving camera and a public that cannot get enough of photos of stars and starlets -- and the closer to naked the better.
And Emma Watson is right. She wasn't naked underneath her long-wrap gown at Tuesday's London "Harry Potter" premiere. Emma Watson showed a refreshing sense of propriety with regard to her wardrobe malfunction. She even looked embarrassed, something even more refreshing in an industry that seems to laud the ever more audacious and obnoxious among its young heirs.
No, she was not naked, having a bit more class and a whole lot more professional modesty than some of our leading celebrities who don't seem to mind showing off their naughty bits to the public, "accidentally" flashing the paparazzi full-on shots of nether parts that weren't hid very well to begin with (if they were hidden at all). A strategically worn garment can get one noticed, but a strategic bend or spread and you're front-page news (at least in the tabloids).